DOJ wants to scrap Watergate-era rule that makes presidential records public

It has been reported that the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel has issued a sweeping memorandum concluding the Presidential Records Act (PRA) is unconstitutional — in short, that presidential records are private property, not public. The memo, which is already drawing lawsuits and sharp criticism, would upend nearly 50 years of post‑Watergate transparency. Big claim. Bigger stakes.
What the DOJ is arguing — and what critics say
According to the memo, the PRA improperly treats presidential papers as government property subject to the National Archives and the Freedom of Information Act. It has been reported that the department suggests presidents can assert private ownership over their records, potentially keeping internal deliberations out of public view. Critics call this a power grab; defenders argue it protects frank counsel and executive confidentiality. Either way, litigation is brewing.
Why it matters — and who keeps the keys?
The PRA was passed after Watergate to make sure future historians, journalists and the public could see how executive decisions were made. Under the law, presidential records transfer to the National Archives and can be released under FOIA after a set period. If the new DOJ view takes hold, private hands — or private foundations — could end up deciding which parts of the American story survive. It has been reported that Eric Trump recently unveiled renderings for a privately financed “Trump Presidential Library” skyscraper in Miami, raising the question: who will control access, and will researchers still get a front‑row seat?
This is not just bureaucratic nitpicking. The emotional core here is simple: democracy depends on memory. Take that away and you risk letting entire presidencies become curated exhibits rather than open archives. Lawsuits will decide the legal fate; the rest of us should decide whether we want our history privatized. Who gets to tell the story — and who reads it — matters.
Sources: theintercept.com, Hacker News
Comments